A phase III study comparing preservative-free latanoprost eye drop emulsion with preserved latanoprost in open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension

Baudouin, Christophe ; Stalmans, Ingeborg ; Bourne, Rupert ; Larrosa, Jose Manuel ; Schmickler, Stefanie ; Seleznev, Aleksey ; Oddone, Francesco ; El-Shabrawi, Yosuf ; Garhoefer, Gerhard ; Mossboeck, Georg ; Stalmans, Ingeborg ; Kaljurand, Kuldar ; Noor, Kai ; Jugaste, Tia ; Kaarniranta, Kai ; Baudouin, Christophe ; Santiago, Pierre Yves ; Labetoulle, Marc ; Schweitzer, Cedric ; Vabres, Bertand ; Lorenz, Katrin ; Schuart, Claudia ; Spitzer, Martin ; Hamacher, Thomas ; Schmickler, Stefanie [...] Show all 66 authors
A phase III study comparing preservative-free latanoprost eye drop emulsion with preserved latanoprost in open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension
Resumen: Background/Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of preservative-free latanoprost eye drop emulsion in reducing intraocular pressure (IOP) versus preserved latanoprost in open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT). Methods: A Phase III non-inferiority study randomised patients with OAG/OHT 1:1 to receive preservative-free latanoprost eye drop emulsion or preserved latanoprost. The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline in peak (9:00 A.M. ± 1 h) and trough (4:00 P.M. ± 1 h) IOP at Week 12 (non-inferiority margin: 95% confidence interval for treatment difference of ≤1.5 mmHg). Key secondary endpoints were change from baseline in corneal fluorescein staining (CFS) score and in ocular surface disease (OSD) average symptom score at Week 12 (in patients with baseline CFS ≥ 1 or OSD score > 0, respectively). Results: Non-inferiority criteria for IOP-lowering were met. Least square (LS) mean (standard error [SE]) IOP change from baseline with preservative-free latanoprost eye drop emulsion (N = 193) versus preserved latanoprost (N = 193) at Week 12 was −8.8 (0.3) mmHg versus −8.2 (0.3) mmHg at peak (difference: −0.6 mmHg; nominal p = 0.023); −8.6 (0.2) mmHg versus −8.1 (0.3) mmHg at trough (difference: −0.5 mmHg; p = 0.080). LS mean change in CFS (SE) was −0.7 (0.07) with preservative-free latanoprost eye drop emulsion and −0.4 (0.08) with preserved latanoprost (nominal p < 0.001). LS mean change in OSD symptom score was −0.3 (0.1) with preservative-free latanoprost eye drop emulsion and −0.2 (0.1) with preserved latanoprost (nominal p = 0.090). Conclusions: Preservative-free latanoprost eye drop emulsion demonstrated non-inferior IOP-lowering efficacy compared with preserved latanoprost, and improved signs and symptoms of OSD.
Idioma: Inglés
DOI: 10.1038/s41433-025-03646-z
Año: 2025
Publicado en: Eye (Basingstoke) (2025), [9 pp.]
ISSN: 0950-222X

Tipo y forma: Article (Published version)
Área (Departamento): Área Oftalmología (Dpto. Cirugía)

Creative Commons You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.


Exportado de SIDERAL (2025-03-10-12:56:52)


Visitas y descargas

Este artículo se encuentra en las siguientes colecciones:
Articles > Artículos por área > Oftalmología



 Record created 2025-03-10, last modified 2025-03-10


Versión publicada:
 PDF
Rate this document:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Not yet reviewed)