Disease landscapes beyond the
Resumen: “C’est par l’accent que l’histoire met sur le changement et sur les différences ou écarts affectant les changements qu’elle se distingue des autres sciences sociales et principalement de la sociologie”, argued Paul Ricoeur in his classic study La mémoire, l’histoire, l’oubli 1. We could add to this that change —the passage from one collective situation or circumstance to another— would constitute not only the most specific object of history, but also a major impetus for historians to do research and, in general, for the development of historical science. As Reinhart Koselleck pointed out in Future Pasts. On the semantics of historical time, changes produce a “penetration [rupture] of the horizon of expectations” (taking these as “the future made present”) that inevitably leads to a “restructuring of the space of experiences” (taking these as “the past made present”) 2. Each generation of historians would, thus, feel compelled from the changes occurring in its present to rewrite history in order to re-imagine collective destiny (and vice versa)...
Idioma: Inglés
DOI: 10.30827/dynamis.v45i1.33086
Año: 2025
Publicado en: Dynamis 45, 1 (2025), 11-25
ISSN: 0211-9536

Tipo y forma: Article (Published version)
Área (Departamento): Área Historia de la Ciencia (Dpto. Ciencias Doc. Hª Ciencia)

Creative Commons You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.


Exportado de SIDERAL (2025-10-17-14:24:59)


Visitas y descargas

Este artículo se encuentra en las siguientes colecciones:
Articles > Artículos por área > Historia de la Ciencia



 Record created 2025-06-19, last modified 2025-10-17


Versión publicada:
 PDF
Rate this document:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Not yet reviewed)