On the Limits of Functionalism: A Reply to Bierl (2025)
Resumen: Bernd Bierl eloquently proposes an ambitious synthesis towards biological linguistics. This synthesis aims to establish a new bio-ethological linguistics based on 4E cognition. It considers the foundational ethology of authors like Konrad Lorenz and Nikolaas Tinbergen to be its biological basis. Rather than developing the biolinguistics inspired by Noam Chomsky, which also has its roots in early 20th-century European ethology, the author considers it an inadequate naturalization and suggests subsuming it under a conception of language as behavior, within the context of embodied, embedded, enacted, and extended (4E) cognition. This reply presents some critical observations on this proposal, highlighting the inadequate interpretation of the biolinguistic approach and the potential shortcomings of the proposed research program.
Idioma: Inglés
DOI: 10.5964/bioling.21633
Año: 2026
Publicado en: Biolinguistics 20 (2026), [7 pp.]
ISSN: 1450-3417

Tipo y forma: Article (Published version)
Área (Departamento): Área Lingüística General (Dpto. Lingüíst.y Liter.Hispán.)

Creative Commons You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.


Exportado de SIDERAL (2026-01-23-14:33:36)


Visitas y descargas

Este artículo se encuentra en las siguientes colecciones:
Articles > Artículos por área > Lingüística General



 Record created 2026-01-23, last modified 2026-01-23


Versión publicada:
 PDF
Rate this document:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Not yet reviewed)