Neurocognitive outcomes of reinforced representational modelling in anatomical learning: The role of executive functions
Resumen: Purpose
This study examined neurocognitive outcomes of an innovative teaching approach in undergraduate anatomical education, focusing on executive functions with emphasis on cognitive flexibility. Reinforced representational modelling was implemented to assess its potential to support learning processes.
Methods
A quasi-experimental study involved first-year anatomy students from two universities (n = 116). Each institution delivered a single 30-hour program with different teaching methods: conventional lectures using 3D atlases and standard drawing tasks (control group) versus reinforced representational modelling (experimental group), taught by its regular instructor and aligned with its syllabus. Pre- and post-intervention outcomes were assessed using psychometric instruments: the Webexec scale for perceived executive difficulties and the Cognitive Flexibility Scale for cognitive flexibility. Statistical analyses included independent-samples t-tests, repeated-measures factorial ANCOVAs (time × treatment), and effect size estimations (Cohen’s d, partial η²).
Results
Perceived executive difficulties showed a strong time effect across both groups (F(1) = 20.28, p < 0.001, η²p = 0.176), increasing over the course, whereas no treatment effect appeared after controlling for baseline differences. Cognitive flexibility was higher in the experimental group at post-test (p = 0.044, Cohen’s d = 0.36), although this advantage diminished once covariates were controlled.
Conclusions
Reinforced representational modelling may foster flexible learning strategies in anatomy education. Cognitive flexibility showed some responsiveness to the intervention, while increases in perceived executive difficulties likely reflect the cognitive demands of early anatomy learning. Although effects were modest and partly influenced by covariates and baseline differences, findings suggest that executive functioning remains a key neurocognitive determinant in anatomical learning.

Idioma: Inglés
DOI: 10.1016/j.aanat.2026.152783
Año: 2026
Publicado en: ANNALS OF ANATOMY-ANATOMISCHER ANZEIGER 264 (2026), 152783 [8 pp.]
ISSN: 0940-9602

Financiación: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/UZ/JIUZ2022-CSJ-20
Tipo y forma: Artículo (Versión definitiva)
Área (Departamento): Area Anatom.Embriol.Humana (Dpto. Anatom.Histolog.Humanas)
Área (Departamento): Área Didáctica y Organiz. Esc. (Dpto. Ciencias de la Educación)


Creative Commons Debe reconocer adecuadamente la autoría, proporcionar un enlace a la licencia e indicar si se han realizado cambios. Puede hacerlo de cualquier manera razonable, pero no de una manera que sugiera que tiene el apoyo del licenciador o lo recibe por el uso que hace. No puede utilizar el material para una finalidad comercial. Si remezcla, transforma o crea a partir del material, no puede difundir el material modificado.


Exportado de SIDERAL (2026-02-11-10:27:47)


Visitas y descargas

Este artículo se encuentra en las siguientes colecciones:
Artículos > Artículos por área > Didáctica y Organización Escolar
Artículos > Artículos por área > Anatomía y Embriología Humana



 Registro creado el 2026-02-11, última modificación el 2026-02-11


Versión publicada:
 PDF
Valore este documento:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Sin ninguna reseña)