A large interlaboratory electron diffraction study of monolayer graphene

Tillotson, Evan ; Thornley, William ; Talbott, William ; Eggeman, Alexander S ; Kriuchkova, Daria ; Sullivan-Allsop, Sam ; Smith, Matt ; Liu, Xuzhao ; Slattery, Ashley ; Yap, Pei Lay ; Losic, Dusan ; Xu, Zhun ; Wang, Huan ; Ciston, Jim ; Rakowski, Alexander ; Ribet, Stephanie M ; Savitzky, Benjamin H ; Schuster, Manfred E ; Allen, Christopher S ; Douglas-Henry, Danielle ; Nicolosi, Valeria ; Herzing, Andrew ; O’Connell, Jacques ; Olivier, Ezra J ; Neethling, Jan ; Zou, Yi-Chao ; Duran, Ercin ; Cai, Rongsheng ; Ngo, Duc-The ; Gorbachev, Roman ; Haas, Jonas ; Schlegel, Michael ; Meyer, Jannik ; Centeno, Alba ; Pesquera, Amaia ; Zurutuza, Amaia ; Kang, Sungsu ; Park, Jungwon ; Erofeev, Ivan ; Mirsaidov, Utkur ; Ophus, Colin ; Rentenberger, Christian ; Waitz, Thomas ; Kotakoski, Jani ; Roy, Abhijit (Universidad de Zaragoza) ; Arenal, Raul ; Pollard, Andrew J ; Haigh, Sarah J

Resumen: Standardisation of data collection and analysis is essential to enable commercialisation of 2D materials in a wide range of technologies. Selected area electron diffraction (SAED) in the transmission electron microscope (TEM) is one of the key methods for distinguishing monolayer from bilayer and few-layer graphene by comparing the 1st and 2nd order diffraction spot intensities. Yet there are many factors that can affect the reliability of data collection and interpretation, causing the measurement of monolayer samples to deviate from the literature boundary condition of I-{2 & strns;110}/I-{11 & strns;00}< 1 for monolayer graphene (1LG). Here we present the results of a large interlaboratory SAED comparison study, where 15 international laboratories measured and analysed nominally identical samples of chemical vapour deposited graphene. Large variations were observed in the measured ratios of diffraction spot intensities, with the largest variance associated with poor quality SAED data resulting from inadequate specimen handling and storage. To inform the reliable determination of monolayer thickness from SAED patterns we provide a description of best practice for specimen handling, TEM operation, data collection and analysis. This work was undertaken within VAMAS Technical Working Area 41: Graphene and related 2D materials-Project 9, the results of which have been directly incorporated into ISO/TS 21356-2 for the characterisation of graphene sheets. We find that when this methodology is followed, 1LG can be distinguished from bilayer or thicker material with high confidence where analysis of a single SAED pattern gives I-{2 & strns;110}/I-{11 & strns;00}< 1.2, even in the absence of precise specimen tilting.

Idioma: Inglés

DOI: 10.1088/2053-1583/ae2ca1

Año: 2025

Publicado en: 2D MATERIALS 13, 2 (2025), 025007 [17 pp.]
ISSN: 2053-1583

Financiación: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/DGA/E13-23R
Financiación: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MICIU/CEX2023-001286-S
Financiación: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MICIU/PID2023-151080NB-I00
Financiación: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MICIU/PRTR-C17.I1

Tipo y forma: Article (Published version)

Área (Departamento): Área Física Materia Condensada (Dpto. Física Materia Condensa.)

Dataset asociado: The data that support the findings of this study will be openly available following an embargo at the following URL/DOI ( https://zenodo.org/records/15639586)