000057824 001__ 57824
000057824 005__ 20210121114526.0
000057824 0248_ $$2sideral$$a92816
000057824 037__ $$aART-2015-92816
000057824 041__ $$aspa
000057824 100__ $$0(orcid)0000-0001-6420-6364$$aGuerrero, A.
000057824 245__ $$aEstudio comparativo de la calidad de la canal y la carne de lechales de raza Churra Tensina y dos tipos ovinos comerciales amparados bajo marcas de calidad
000057824 260__ $$c2015
000057824 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000057824 5203_ $$aThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the rearing and slaughtering season (spring vs. autumn) on the carcass and meat quality of suckling lambs from Churra Tensina breed (n= 26), and to compared the results with two commercial lambs within Protected Geographical Indication (PGI) Lechazo de Castilla-León (n= 13) and Ternasco de Aragón (n= 13). All animals were reared, selected and slaughtered under commercial conditions. After slaughter, carcass and meat quality were evaluated in the Longissimus thoracis lumborum (LTL) muscle. Slaughter season mainly affected both the tissue composition of the carcass, presenting Churra Tensina breed suckling lambs from spring greater muscle and bone, and lower fat percentages (p=0.001) and a higher proportion of fatty acids: C 12:0, CLA, C 20:2 n-3 and C 22:0 (p=0.001) in IMF. However, those differences in quality were not reflected when sensory methodologies (trained panel or consumers analyses) were conducted. Related to commercial lambs from the GPI’s studied, meat from Churra Tensina breed showed a higher tenderness (p=0.001) evaluated by instrumental and sensory (trained panel), as well as a higher scores in overall, flavour or tenderness acceptabilities evaluated by consumers (p=0.001). Results would indicate a good potential of the Churra Tensina breed to produce high quality suckling lambs, in both seasons of the year.
000057824 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aAll rights reserved$$uhttp://www.europeana.eu/rights/rr-f/
000057824 592__ $$a0.294$$b2015
000057824 593__ $$aAnimal Science and Zoology$$c2015$$dQ3
000057824 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
000057824 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-8180-8663$$aCampo, M.M.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000057824 700__ $$aOlleta, J.L.
000057824 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-2713-5939$$aResconi, V.C.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000057824 700__ $$aMuela, E.
000057824 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0001-6166-7499$$aSañudo, C.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000057824 7102_ $$12008$$2700$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Produc.Animal Cienc.Ali.$$cÁrea Producción Animal
000057824 773__ $$g64, 247 (2015), 211-220$$pArch. zootec.$$tArchivos de Zootecnia$$x0004-0592
000057824 85641 $$uhttp://www.uco.es/organiza/servicios/publica/az/php/img/web/15_11_12_04_3501_Caracteristicas_040.pdf$$zTexto completo de la revista
000057824 8564_ $$s266277$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/57824/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yVersión publicada
000057824 8564_ $$s95477$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/57824/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yVersión publicada
000057824 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:57824$$particulos$$pdriver
000057824 951__ $$a2021-01-21-11:06:53
000057824 980__ $$aARTICLE