A Randomized Trial of Endovascular Embolization Treatment in Pelvic Congestion Syndrome: Fibered Platinum Coils versus Vascular Plugs with 1-Year Clinical Outcomes
Resumen: Purpose: To compare safety and efficacy of vascular plugs (VPs) and fibered platinum coils (FPCs) for embolization in pelvic congestion syndrome (PCS). Materials and Methods A randomized, prospective, single-center study enrolled 100 women with PCS from January 2014 to January 2015. Patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups, and embolization was performed with FPCs (n = 50) or VPs (n = 50). Mean age of patients was 42.7 years ± 7.60, and mean visual analog scale (VAS) score for pelvic pain before treatment was 7.4 ± 7.60. Primary outcome (clinical success at 1 y using a VAS), number of devices, procedure and fluoroscopy times, radiation doses, costs, and complications were compared, and participants were followed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months.
Results: Clinical success and subjective improvement were not significantly different at 1-year follow-up (89.7% for FPCs vs 90.6% for VPs; P = .760). Mean number of devices per case was 18.2 ± 1.33 for FPCs and 4.1 ± 0.31 for VPs (P < .001). Three FPCs and 1 VP migrated to pulmonary vasculature approximately 3–6 months after the embolization procedure; all were retrieved without complications. The FPC group had a significantly longer fluoroscopy time (33.4 min ± 4.68 vs 19.5 min ± 6.14) and larger radiation dose (air kerma 948.0 mGy ± 248.45 vs 320.7 mGy ± 134.33) (all P < .001).
Conclusions: Embolization for PCS resulted in pain relief in 90% of patients; clinical success was not affected by embolic device. VPs were associated with decreased fluoroscopy time and radiation dose.

Idioma: Inglés
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2017.09.011
Año: 2018
Publicado en: Journal of vascular and interventional radiology 29, 1 (2018), 45-53
ISSN: 1051-0443

Factor impacto JCR: 2.828 (2018)
Categ. JCR: RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING rank: 44 / 129 = 0.341 (2018) - Q2 - T2
Categ. JCR: PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE rank: 27 / 65 = 0.415 (2018) - Q2 - T2

Factor impacto SCIMAGO: 0.912 - Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (Q1) - Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (Q1) - Medicine (miscellaneous) (Q1)

Tipo y forma: Article (PostPrint)
Área (Departamento): Área Radiol. y Medicina Física (Dpto. Pediatría Radiol.Med.Fís)

Creative Commons You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. You may not use the material for commercial purposes. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.


Exportado de SIDERAL (2020-01-17-22:07:53)


Visitas y descargas

Este artículo se encuentra en las siguientes colecciones:
Articles > Artículos por área > Radiología y Medicina Física



 Record created 2018-11-23, last modified 2020-01-17


Postprint:
 PDF
Rate this document:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Not yet reviewed)