Apoyo a las guías de publicación para estudios de evaluación económica por parte de las revistas biomédicas españolas
Catalá-López, F. ; Ridao, M. ; Bernal-Delgado, E. ; Moher, D. ; Repullo, J.R.
Resumen: Objective: To examine the endorsement of reporting guidelines for economic evaluation studies, such as the CHEERS (Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards) statement, by Spanish biomedical journals.
Method: Cross-sectional analysis of the instructions to authors of Spanish biomedical journals included in the Journal Citation Reports 2017. Two authors examined and extracted the following information: mention of any reporting guideline, the CHEERS statement, the recommendations of the International Committee of Medical Journal Directors (ICMJE) and the Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research (EQUATOR) network.
Results: Of the 28 journals included, 23 (82.1%; 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 63.1-93.9%) mentioned at least one reporting guideline in the instructions to authors. Only one journal mentioned the CHEERS statement for health economic evaluations. Twenty-four journals (85.7%; 95%CI: 67.3-96.0%) mentioned the ICMJE recommendations and 8 (28.6%; 95%CI: 13.2-48.7%) mentioned the EQUATOR network. The CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) statement for clinical trials was the most- mentioned reporting guideline (n = 21; 75.0%; 95%CI: 55.1-89.3%).
Discussion: Most of the instructions to authors do not provide guidance on how to report economic evaluations. Journals should support compliance with reporting guidelines by authors and peer-reviewers.
Idioma: Español
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2018.12.006
Año: 2019
Publicado en: GACETA SANITARIA 33, 3 (2019), 255-258
ISSN: 0213-9111
Factor impacto JCR: 1.564 (2019)
Categ. JCR: PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH rank: 134 / 193 = 0.694 (2019) - Q3 - T3
Categ. JCR: PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH rank: 96 / 170 = 0.565 (2019) - Q3 - T2
Categ. JCR: HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES rank: 59 / 87 = 0.678 (2019) - Q3 - T3
Categ. JCR: HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES rank: 80 / 102 = 0.784 (2019) - Q4 - T3
Factor impacto SCIMAGO: 0.424 - Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (Q3)
Financiación: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/ISCIII-REDISSEC/RD16-0001-0007
Tipo y forma: Artículo (Versión definitiva)
Debe reconocer adecuadamente la autoría, proporcionar un enlace a la licencia e indicar si se han realizado cambios. Puede hacerlo de cualquier manera razonable, pero no de una manera que sugiera que tiene el apoyo del licenciador o lo recibe por el uso que hace. No puede utilizar el material para una finalidad comercial. Si remezcla, transforma o crea a partir del material, no puede difundir el material modificado.
Exportado de SIDERAL (2020-07-16-09:09:59)
Visitas y descargas
Method: Cross-sectional analysis of the instructions to authors of Spanish biomedical journals included in the Journal Citation Reports 2017. Two authors examined and extracted the following information: mention of any reporting guideline, the CHEERS statement, the recommendations of the International Committee of Medical Journal Directors (ICMJE) and the Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research (EQUATOR) network.
Results: Of the 28 journals included, 23 (82.1%; 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 63.1-93.9%) mentioned at least one reporting guideline in the instructions to authors. Only one journal mentioned the CHEERS statement for health economic evaluations. Twenty-four journals (85.7%; 95%CI: 67.3-96.0%) mentioned the ICMJE recommendations and 8 (28.6%; 95%CI: 13.2-48.7%) mentioned the EQUATOR network. The CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) statement for clinical trials was the most- mentioned reporting guideline (n = 21; 75.0%; 95%CI: 55.1-89.3%).
Discussion: Most of the instructions to authors do not provide guidance on how to report economic evaluations. Journals should support compliance with reporting guidelines by authors and peer-reviewers.
Idioma: Español
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2018.12.006
Año: 2019
Publicado en: GACETA SANITARIA 33, 3 (2019), 255-258
ISSN: 0213-9111
Factor impacto JCR: 1.564 (2019)
Categ. JCR: PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH rank: 134 / 193 = 0.694 (2019) - Q3 - T3
Categ. JCR: PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH rank: 96 / 170 = 0.565 (2019) - Q3 - T2
Categ. JCR: HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES rank: 59 / 87 = 0.678 (2019) - Q3 - T3
Categ. JCR: HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES rank: 80 / 102 = 0.784 (2019) - Q4 - T3
Factor impacto SCIMAGO: 0.424 - Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (Q3)
Financiación: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/ISCIII-REDISSEC/RD16-0001-0007
Tipo y forma: Artículo (Versión definitiva)
Debe reconocer adecuadamente la autoría, proporcionar un enlace a la licencia e indicar si se han realizado cambios. Puede hacerlo de cualquier manera razonable, pero no de una manera que sugiera que tiene el apoyo del licenciador o lo recibe por el uso que hace. No puede utilizar el material para una finalidad comercial. Si remezcla, transforma o crea a partir del material, no puede difundir el material modificado.Exportado de SIDERAL (2020-07-16-09:09:59)
Enlace permanente:
Visitas y descargas
Este artículo se encuentra en las siguientes colecciones:
Artículos
Registro creado el 2019-05-08, última modificación el 2020-07-16