Resumen: The two procedures traditionally followed for group decision making with the Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) are the Aggregation of Individual Judgments (AIJ) and the Aggregation of Individual Priorities (AIP). In both cases, the geometric mean is used to synthesise judgments and individual priorities into a collective position. Unfortunately, positional measures (means) are only representative if dispersion is reduced. It is therefore necessary to develop decision tools that allow: (i) the identification of groups of actors that present homogeneous and differentiated behaviours; and, (ii) the aggregation of the priorities of the near groups to reach collective positions with the greatest possible consensus. Following a Bayesian approach to AHP in a local context (a single criterion), this work proposes a methodology to solve these problems when the number of actors is not high. The method is based on Bayesian comparison and selection of model tools which identify the number and composition of the groups as well as their priorities. This information can be very useful to identify agreement paths among the decision makers that can culminate in a more representative decision-making process. The proposal is illustrated by a real-life case study. Idioma: Inglés DOI: 10.3390/math7030294 Año: 2019 Publicado en: Mathematics 7, 3 (2019), 294 [13 pp.] ISSN: 2227-7390 Factor impacto JCR: 1.747 (2019) Categ. JCR: MATHEMATICS rank: 28 / 323 = 0.087 (2019) - Q1 - T1 Factor impacto SCIMAGO: 0.299 - Mathematics (miscellaneous) (Q3)