000079564 001__ 79564
000079564 005__ 20231215090948.0
000079564 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1080/03906701.2018.1478688
000079564 0248_ $$2sideral$$a107811
000079564 037__ $$aART-2018-107811
000079564 041__ $$aeng
000079564 100__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-8330-4338$$aMoya Santander, Laura$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000079564 245__ $$aCrip posthumanism and Native American Indian postanthropocentrism: keys to a bodily perspective in science
000079564 260__ $$c2018
000079564 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000079564 5203_ $$aThe dominant thought in the Western Culture, put the soul first and despised the body, generating distinctions and hierarchies in which the spiritual or immaterial was considered superior to the corporeal or material. But the bodies have not allowed themselves to be reduced to these dichotomous patterns. The queer discovered the body, worked with it, but returned to the field of immateriality in which the identity is lodged. The crip has completed the gesture of the queer entering fully into the field of the body, denaturalizing categories (deficiency and disability) and interpreting it as radically interdependent. However, in the absence of tradition in dealing with the body, both in reflection and politics, we are inspired by other cultures that always put corporeality in the foreground. The Native American Indians are explicit in terms of contrast between humans and non-humans, because for them there is a unique culture with multiple natures, as opposed to Western, because we believe in plurality of cultures and in a uniform nature. In order to coexist with this diversity, the West has invented ‘cultural relativism’ and ‘multiculturalism’, while the Native American Indians have developed a ‘multinaturalism’ with their ‘perspectivism’. We propose to denominate perspectivism a modality of science and politics that could manifest the radical influence of bodies.
000079564 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aAll rights reserved$$uhttp://www.europeana.eu/rights/rr-f/
000079564 592__ $$a0.206$$b2018
000079564 593__ $$aSociology and Political Science$$c2018$$dQ3
000079564 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
000079564 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-1134-9377$$aBergua Amores, José Ángel$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000079564 7102_ $$14009$$2775$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Psicología y Sociología$$cÁrea Sociología
000079564 773__ $$g28, 3 (2018), 492-509$$pRev. int. sociol.$$tInternational Review of Sociology$$x0390-6701
000079564 8564_ $$s319021$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/79564/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yPostprint
000079564 8564_ $$s117161$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/79564/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yPostprint
000079564 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:79564$$particulos$$pdriver
000079564 951__ $$a2023-12-15-08:57:35
000079564 980__ $$aARTICLE