Analysis of the main passive soft tissues associated with adult acquired flatfoot deformity development: A computational modeling approach

Cifuentes-De la Portilla, C. ; Larrainzar-Garijo, R. ; Bayod, J. (Universidad de Zaragoza)

Resumen: Adult acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD) is a pathology with a wide range of treatment options. Physicians decide the best treatment based on their experience, so the process is entirely subjective. A better understanding of soft tissue stress and its contribution in supporting the plantar arch could help to guide the clinical decision. Traditional experimental trials cannot consistently evaluate the contribution of each tissue. Therefore, in this research a 3-Dimensional FE foot model was reconstructed from a normal patient in order to measure the stress of the passive stabilizers of the arch, and its variation in different scenarios related with intermediate stages of AAFD development. All bones, the plantar fascia (PF), cartilages, plantar ligaments and the spring ligament (SL) were included, respecting their anatomical distribution and biomechanical characteristics. An AAFD evaluation scenario was simulated. The relative contribution of each tissue was obtained comparing each result with a normal case. The results show that PF is the main tissue that prevents the arch elongation, while SL mainly reduces the foot pronation. Long and short plantar ligaments play a secondary role in this process. The stress increment on both PF and SL when one of two fails suggests that these tissues complement each other. These findings support the theory that regards the tibialis posterior tendon as a secondary actor in the arch maintenance, compared with the PF and the SL, because this tendon is overstretched by the hindfoot pronation around the talonavicular joint. This approach could help to improve the understanding of AAFD.

Idioma: Inglés

DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.12.047

Año: 2019

Publicado en: Journal of Biomechanics 84, 14 (2019), 183-190
ISSN: 0021-9290

Factor impacto JCR: 2.32 (2019)

Categ. JCR: ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL rank: 48 / 87 = 0.552 (2019) - Q3 - T2
Categ. JCR: BIOPHYSICS rank: 38 / 71 = 0.535 (2019) - Q3 - T2

Factor impacto SCIMAGO: 1.011 - Biomedical Engineering (Q1) - Biophysics (Q1) - Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (Q1) - Rehabilitation (Q1) - Sports Science (Q2)

Financiación: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MINECO/DPI2016-77016-R

Tipo y forma: Artículo (PostPrint)

Área (Departamento): Área Mec.Med.Cont. y Teor.Est. (Dpto. Ingeniería Mecánica)