Effects of behavioural activation on substance use and depression: a systematic review (vol 13, 36, 2018)
Martinez-Vispo, C. ; Martinez, U. ; Lopez-Duran, A. ; Fernandez del Rio, E. (Universidad de Zaragoza) ; Becona, E.
Resumen: Following publication of the original article [1], we have been notified that there are some parts in the article text that need to be changed as per below:
Table 2 Ratings of methodological quality by EPHPP should change Blinding rating of Busch et al. (2017) [43] from Weak to Moderate and Global rating from Moderate to Strong;
Abstract text part should be changed to: One trial received weak methodological quality, five moderate, and two strong;
Results text part in Methodological quality assessment should be changed to: Overall, two studies received a methodological quality rating of strong [43, 49], five studies of moderate [45–48, 50], and one study of weak [44];
Discussion text part should be changed to: Regarding the quality of the studies, it is of note that only two of the studies reached the qualification of strong methodological quality [43, 49].
Idioma: Inglés
DOI: 10.1186/s13011-020-00274-6
Año: 2020
Publicado en: Substance Abuse Treatment Prevention and Policy 15, 1 (2020), 37 [1 pp]
ISSN: 1747-597X
Factor impacto JCR: 2.583 (2020)
Categ. JCR: SUBSTANCE ABUSE rank: 23 / 37 = 0.622 (2020) - Q3 - T2
Factor impacto SCIMAGO: 0.75 - Psychiatry and Mental Health (Q2) - Health Policy (Q2)
Tipo y forma: (Published version)
Área (Departamento): Área Psicología Social (Dpto. Psicología y Sociología)
You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
Exportado de SIDERAL (2022-01-20-22:57:20)
Visitas y descargas
Table 2 Ratings of methodological quality by EPHPP should change Blinding rating of Busch et al. (2017) [43] from Weak to Moderate and Global rating from Moderate to Strong;
Abstract text part should be changed to: One trial received weak methodological quality, five moderate, and two strong;
Results text part in Methodological quality assessment should be changed to: Overall, two studies received a methodological quality rating of strong [43, 49], five studies of moderate [45–48, 50], and one study of weak [44];
Discussion text part should be changed to: Regarding the quality of the studies, it is of note that only two of the studies reached the qualification of strong methodological quality [43, 49].
Idioma: Inglés
DOI: 10.1186/s13011-020-00274-6
Año: 2020
Publicado en: Substance Abuse Treatment Prevention and Policy 15, 1 (2020), 37 [1 pp]
ISSN: 1747-597X
Factor impacto JCR: 2.583 (2020)
Categ. JCR: SUBSTANCE ABUSE rank: 23 / 37 = 0.622 (2020) - Q3 - T2
Factor impacto SCIMAGO: 0.75 - Psychiatry and Mental Health (Q2) - Health Policy (Q2)
Tipo y forma: (Published version)
Área (Departamento): Área Psicología Social (Dpto. Psicología y Sociología)
You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. Exportado de SIDERAL (2022-01-20-22:57:20)
Permalink:
Visitas y descargas
Este artículo se encuentra en las siguientes colecciones:
Articles
Record created 2020-06-30, last modified 2022-01-20