The choice of the appropriate Great Cultural Project, as a tool for the realization of strategic development plans of contemporary cities
Resumen: Great Cultural Projects (GCPs) have a multi‐layer influence on the development of cities, their socio‐economic situation, functional‐spatial structure, tourist attractions as well as their environment quality. The article focuses on the comparison between different types of the GCPs (including: world and international exhibitions, gardening exhibitions, Olympic Games and equally prestigious projects by the European Capitals of Culture) and the role they have played in the development of the cities. The research covered 183 GCPs organized from the 19th till the beginning of the 21st century. GCPs have acted as a catalyst for the development of new districts and the regeneration of degraded areas which resulted not only in creating numerous architectural icons and new city image but also in the social awareness raising and global education. The opportunities as well as the threats of GCPs are closely connected with the GCP type, so the choice of the appropriate
GCP can be a tool for the realization of the strategic plans of the city. The aim of the work is to define potential transformation possibilities which each of the GCP has to offer.

Idioma: Inglés
DOI: 10.22530/ayc.2016.N10.367
Año: 2016
Publicado en: Arte y Ciudad 10 (2016), 75-96
ISSN: 2254-2930

Tipo y forma: Article (Published version)
Área (Departamento): Área Expresión Gráfica en Ing. (Dpto. Ingeniería Diseño Fabri.)

Creative Commons You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. You may not use the material for commercial purposes.


Exportado de SIDERAL (2020-09-15-09:18:07)


Visitas y descargas

Este artículo se encuentra en las siguientes colecciones:
Articles



 Record created 2020-09-15, last modified 2020-09-15


Versión publicada:
 PDF
Rate this document:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Not yet reviewed)