Causal explanations for the evolution of ‘low gear’ locomotion in insular ruminants
Resumen: Aim: Mammals on islands often undergo remarkable evolutionary changes. The acquisition of ‘low gear’ locomotion, namely short and robust limb elements, has been typically associated with the island syndrome in large mammals and, especially, ruminants. Here we provide an investigative framework to examine biotic and abiotic selective factors hypothesized to influence evolution of this peculiar type of gait. Location: Islands worldwide. Taxon: Bovidae. Methods: We calculated response variables associated with ‘low gear’ locomotion in 21 extinct and extant insular bovids. We assembled data on the physiography of 11 islands and on life history and ecological traits of the focal taxa. We estimated 10 predictors (island area and four topographic indices, body mass, body size divergence, number of predators and competitors, large mammal richness) and used multiple regressions, regression trees, and random forests to assess their contextual importance. Results: The acquisition of ‘low gear’ locomotion generally happens on islands with a small number of competitors. However, the roughness of the island terrain appears to be also important, without being a main driver. Finally, although the most extreme cases of ‘low gear’ locomotion occurred on islands with no mammalian predators, our models show a non-significant relationship with this factor. Main conclusions: The evolution of ‘low gear’ locomotion in insular ruminants does not simply result from phyletic dwarfing and predatory release. Variation in morphological responses within Bovidae to ecological and topographic traits suggests, instead, a complex interplay of biotic and abiotic factors. Current understanding on the main drivers of species evolutionary pathways and biogeographic patterns are disproportionally based on few taxa, mainly vertebrates, and in some extreme cases (like this one) even on few species. Here we show how adding more data, even within the same taxonomic group, can challenge historically accepted macroevolutionary and macroecological concepts.
Idioma: Inglés
DOI: 10.1111/jbi.13942
Año: 2021
Publicado en: JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY 47, 10 (2021), 2274-2285
ISSN: 0305-0270

Factor impacto JCR: 4.81 (2021)
Categ. JCR: ECOLOGY rank: 41 / 174 = 0.236 (2021) - Q1 - T1
Categ. JCR: GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL rank: 9 / 50 = 0.18 (2021) - Q1 - T1

Factor impacto CITESCORE: 7.3 - Environmental Science (Q1) - Agricultural and Biological Sciences (Q1)

Factor impacto SCIMAGO: 1.607 - Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (Q1) - Ecology (Q1)

Tipo y forma: Article (Published version)
Área (Departamento): Área Paleontología (Dpto. Ciencias de la Tierra)

Creative Commons You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.


Exportado de SIDERAL (2023-05-18-13:30:48)


Visitas y descargas

Este artículo se encuentra en las siguientes colecciones:
Articles > Artículos por área > Paleontología



 Record created 2020-10-06, last modified 2023-05-19


Versión publicada:
 PDF
Rate this document:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Not yet reviewed)