Consumer preferences for nutritional claims: An exploration of attention and choice based on an eye-tracking choice experiment
Resumen: Nutritional claim (NC) requirements on food packages are among the most important and influential EU policy measures related to diet and have the capacity to promote healthy eating. This study combines a discrete choice experiment (DCE) method with eye-tracking (ET) technology to assess consumer preferences for multiple NCs in yogurt selection and explores the relationships between the NC preferences and the visual attention paid to these claims and the visual attention and choice decisions. The results indicate that the low-sugar NC was the least-preferred claim in all the models. Overall, the presence of NCs generally increases visual attention in terms of fixation count, which may be linked to an increased likelihood of affecting the final decision to purchase yogurts with NCs.
Idioma: Inglés
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.12.031
Año: 2019
Publicado en: Food Research International 116 (2019), 37-48
ISSN: 0963-9969

Factor impacto JCR: 4.972 (2019)
Categ. JCR: FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY rank: 11 / 139 = 0.079 (2019) - Q1 - T1
Factor impacto SCIMAGO: 1.44 - Food Science (Q1)

Financiación: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/INIA/RTA2013-0092-00-00
Tipo y forma: Article (PostPrint)
Área (Departamento): Área Econom.Sociol.Polit.Agra. (Dpto. CC.Agrar.y Medio Natural)

Creative Commons You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. You may not use the material for commercial purposes. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.


Exportado de SIDERAL (2020-10-09-17:45:26)


Visitas y descargas

Este artículo se encuentra en las siguientes colecciones:
Articles > Artículos por área > Economía, Sociología y Política Agraria



 Record created 2020-10-09, last modified 2020-10-09


Postprint:
 PDF
Rate this document:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Not yet reviewed)