Constitución y dislocación: el giro lingüístico en Jacques Derrida
Lopez De Lizaga, Jose Luis (Universidad de Zaragoza)
Resumen: Este artículo examina los argumentos de Jacques Derrida contra la fenomenología de Husserl y a favor de la tesis principal del giro lingüístico: la tesis de que no hay pensamiento sin lenguaje. A continuación se defiende que la disolución derridiana de la subjetividad en el lenguaje no es la consecuencia de afirmar el giro lingüístico como tal, sino del modelo de lenguaje que adopta y radicaliza Derrida: el modelo estructuralista de Ferdinand de Saussure. Finalmente, partiendo de las objeciones de Ricoeur se argumenta que la omisión de la dimensión pragmática del lenguaje (el habla) es la raíz de las principales paradojas de la filosofía postestructuralista de Derrida en la teoría del significado, la referencia y la subjetividad.
This paper analyzes Jacques Derrida's arguments against Husserl's phenomenology and in support of the main thesis of the linguistic turn, namely: there is no possible thinking without language. Next the paper shows that Derrida's dissolution of subjectivity in language is not a consequence of the linguistic turn as such, but of Saussure's structuralist language model which Derrida adopts and radicalizes. Finally, following some arguments of Ricoeur the paper states that the omission of the pragmatic dimension of language is the main root of Derrida's paradoxical theses about meaning, reference and subjectivity.
Idioma: Español
DOI: 10.14422/pen.v76.i289.y2020.001
Año: 2020
Publicado en: Pensamiento (Madrid. 1945) 76, 289 (2020), 229-250
ISSN: 0031-4749
Factor impacto SCIMAGO: 0.135 - Philosophy (Q3)
Tipo y forma: Article (Published version)
Área (Departamento): Área Filosofía (Unidad Predepartam. Filosofía)
You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. You may not use the material for commercial purposes. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
Exportado de SIDERAL (2021-09-02-10:24:38)
Visitas y descargas
This paper analyzes Jacques Derrida's arguments against Husserl's phenomenology and in support of the main thesis of the linguistic turn, namely: there is no possible thinking without language. Next the paper shows that Derrida's dissolution of subjectivity in language is not a consequence of the linguistic turn as such, but of Saussure's structuralist language model which Derrida adopts and radicalizes. Finally, following some arguments of Ricoeur the paper states that the omission of the pragmatic dimension of language is the main root of Derrida's paradoxical theses about meaning, reference and subjectivity.
Idioma: Español
DOI: 10.14422/pen.v76.i289.y2020.001
Año: 2020
Publicado en: Pensamiento (Madrid. 1945) 76, 289 (2020), 229-250
ISSN: 0031-4749
Factor impacto SCIMAGO: 0.135 - Philosophy (Q3)
Tipo y forma: Article (Published version)
Área (Departamento): Área Filosofía (Unidad Predepartam. Filosofía)
You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. You may not use the material for commercial purposes. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material. Exportado de SIDERAL (2021-09-02-10:24:38)
Permalink:
Visitas y descargas
Este artículo se encuentra en las siguientes colecciones:
Articles > Artículos por área > Filosofía
Record created 2020-12-17, last modified 2021-09-02