Reply to Elmendorf and Ettinger: Photoperiod playsa dominantand irreplaceable role in triggering secondary growth resumption

Huang, J.G. ; Campelo, F. ; Ma, Q. ; Zhang, Y. ; Bergeron, Y. ; Deslauriers, A. ; Fonti, P. ; Liang, E. ; Mäkinen, H. ; Oberhuber, W. ; Rathgeber, C.B.K. ; Tognetti, R. ; Treml, V. ; Yang, B. ; Zhai, L. ; Zhang, J.L. ; Antonucci, S. ; Camarero, J.J. ; Cufar, K. ; Cuny, H.E. ; de Luis, M. (Universidad de Zaragoza) ; Giovannelli, A. ; Gricar, J. ; Gruber, A. ; Gryc, V. ; Güney, A. ; Guo, X. ; Huang, W. ; Jyske, T. ; Kašpar, J. ; King, G. ; Krause, C. ; Lemay, A. ; Liu, F. ; Lombardi, F. ; Martínez del Castillo, E. ; Morin, H. ; Nabais, C. ; Nöjd, P. ; Peters, R.L. ; Prislan, P. ; Saracino, A. ; Swidrak, I. ; Vavrcík, H. ; Vieira, J. ; Yu, B. ; Zhang, S. ; Zeng, Q. ; Ziaco, E. ; Rossi, S.

Resumen: In their Letter, Elmendorf and Ettinger (1) question the dominant role of photoperiod in driving secondary growth resumption (hereafter referred to as xylem formation onset) of the Northern Hemisphere conifers, recently reported by Huang et al. (2). Their opinions are grounded on the following three aspects, including 1) the seasonality of the photoperiod, 2) the dependence of the predictor variables (e.g., photoperiod, forcing, and chilling) on the response variable (the date of onset of xylem formation, day of the year [DOY]), and 3) the limited value of the obtained models for interannual forecasting. We think they bring up an interesting issue that deserves further discussion and clarification.

Photoperiod is acknowledged to regulate spring bud swelling while wood formation starts (3, 4). Although photoperiod seasonality occurs at each site, its influence is marginal in our study given that the analysis involved comparisons among sites across the Northern Hemisphere. Our conclusion that photoperiod plays a dominant role was built upon the combination of several coherent pieces of evidence, rather than “the crux of Huang et al….” as they pointed out. First, we clearly stated that model 2, which modeled DOY as a function of the mean annual temperature of the site (MAT), forcing, chilling, and soil moisture, was considered the best model in terms of parsimony according to minimum Akaike information criterion and Bayesian information criterion, rather than R2 as referred to in their Letter. Second, photoperiod interacted with MAT and can explain 61.7% of the variance of MAT alone (2). Therefore, we concluded that secondary growth resumption was driven primarily by MAT and photoperiod or by their interaction, which is challenging to be disentangled without experimental data, we agree. In terms of biological functioning, they play an ...

Idioma: Inglés

DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2019931117

Año: 2020

Publicado en: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117, 52 (2020), 32865-32867
ISSN: 0027-8424

Factor impacto JCR: 11.205 (2020)

Categ. JCR: MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES rank: 8 / 73 = 0.11 (2020) - Q1 - T1

Factor impacto SCIMAGO: 5.011 - Multidisciplinary (Q1)

Tipo y forma: (Versión definitiva)

Área (Departamento): Área Geografía Física (Dpto. Geograf. Ordenac.Territ.)