Improving sustainability teaching by grouping and interrelating pedagogical approaches and sustainability competences: Evidence from 15 Worldwide Higher Education Institutions
Resumen: There has been increasing research on pedagogical approaches, sustainability competences, and how to connect them in Higher Education Institutions (HEIs). This paper's aim is to provide deeper insights into the system of pedagogical approaches and sustainability competences, as well as how these interrelate. A survey was developed to investigate sustainability teaching in 15 HEIs. The survey was sent to educators of each HEI from which 668 responses were obtained. The responses were analysed in a five-step process: (1) descriptive statistics; (2) Pearson correlations; (3) principal component analyses (PCAs) to detect groups; (4) Pearson correlations between the groups; and (5) regressions. The first step provided the base to carry out the PCAs, from which three groups for the pedagogical approaches (Universal, Social, and Environmental) and three for the sustainability competences (Extrospective-social, Introspective-personal, and Cogitative-processual) were obtained. The correlations between the groups showed that: (1) the competences are closely interrelated; (2) the pedagogical approaches are somehow interrelated; and (3) the pedagogical approaches are somehow interrelated to the competences. The regressions showed that the Universal and Social groups would be most suitable to develop all the competences' groups. The Environmental group develops only the cogitative-processual competences' group. The results served as bases to propose the Sustainability Teaching System (STS), which provides deeper insights into the system of pedagogical approaches and sustainability competences by grouping them, as well as showing directionality and strength. To improve sustainability teaching, it is necessary to understand the pedagogical approaches' groups and how they can develop the competences' groups.
Idioma: Inglés
DOI: 10.1002/sd.2396
Año: 2023
Publicado en: Sustainable Development 31, 1 (2023), 349-359
ISSN: 0968-0802

Factor impacto JCR: 12.5 (2022)
Categ. JCR: GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY rank: 2 / 9 = 0.222 (2022) - Q1 - T1
Categ. JCR: REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING rank: 1 / 40 = 0.025 (2022) - Q1 - T1
Categ. JCR: DEVELOPMENT STUDIES rank: 1 / 42 = 0.024 (2022) - Q1 - T1

Factor impacto CITESCORE: 15.2 - Energy (Q1) - Social Sciences (Q1)

Factor impacto SCIMAGO: 2.283 - Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (Q1) - Development (Q1)

Tipo y forma: Article (Published version)
Área (Departamento): Área Economía Finan. y Contab. (Dpto. Contabilidad y Finanzas)

Creative Commons You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. You may not use the material for commercial purposes. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.


Exportado de SIDERAL (2024-07-05-12:46:19)


Visitas y descargas

Este artículo se encuentra en las siguientes colecciones:
Articles



 Record created 2022-11-24, last modified 2024-07-05


Versión publicada:
 PDF
Rate this document:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Not yet reviewed)