Effects of occipital-atlas stabilization on the upper cervical spine rotation combinations: an in vitro study

Hidalgo García, César (Universidad de Zaragoza) ; Lorente, Ana I. ; López-de-Celis, Carlos ; Lucha López, María Orosia (Universidad de Zaragoza) ; Rodríguez-Sanz, Jacobo ; Maza-Frechín, Mario (Universidad de Zaragoza) ; Tricás-Moreno, José Miguel (Universidad de Zaragoza) ; Krauss, John ; Pérez-Bellmunt, Albert

Resumen: The purpose of this study is to compare axial rotation range of motion for the upper cervical spine during three movements: axial rotation, rotation + flexion + ipsilateral lateral bending and rotation + extension + contralateral lateral bending before and after occiput-atlas (C0–C1)stabilization. Ten cryopreserved C0–C2 specimens (mean age 74 years, range 63–85 years) were manually mobilized in 1. axial rotation, 2. rotation + flexion + ipsilateral lateral bending and 3. rotation + extension + contralateral lateral bending without and with a screw stabilization of C0–C1. Upper cervical range of motion and the force used to generate the motion were measured using an optical motion system and a load cell respectively. The range of motion (ROM) without C0–C1 stabilization was 9.8° ± 3.9° in right rotation + flexion + ipsilateral lateral bending and 15.5° ± 5.9° in left rotation + flexion + ipsilateral lateral bending. With stabilization, the ROM was 6.7° ± 4.3° and 13.6° ± 5.3°, respectively. The ROM without C0–C1 stabilization was
35.1° ± 6.0° in right rotation + extension + contralateral lateral bending and 29.0° ± 6.5° in left rotation + extension + contralateral lateral bending. With stabilization, the ROM was 25.7° ± 6.4°(p = 0.007) and 25.3° ± 7.1°, respectively. Neither rotation + flexion + ipsilateral lateral bending (left or right) or left rotation + extension + contralateral lateral bending reached statistical significance. ROM without C0–C1 stabilization was 33.9° ± 6.7° in right rotation and 28.0° ± 6.9° in left rotation. With stabilization, the ROM was 28.5° ± 7.0° (p = 0.005) and 23.7° ± 8.5° (p = 0.013) respectively. The stabilization of C0–C1 reduced the upper cervical axial rotation in right rotation + extension + contralateral lateral bending and right and left axial rotations; however,this reduction was not present in left rotation + extension + contralateral lateral bending or both
combinations of rotation + flexion + ipsilateral lateral bending.

Idioma: Inglés

DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-30512-3

Año: 2023

Publicado en: Scientific reports (Nature Publishing Group) 13 (2023), 3578 [10 pp.]
ISSN: 2045-2322

Factor impacto JCR: 3.8 (2023)

Categ. JCR: MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES rank: 25 / 134 = 0.187 (2023) - Q1 - T1

Factor impacto CITESCORE: 7.5 - Multidisciplinary (Q1)

Factor impacto SCIMAGO: 0.9 - Multidisciplinary (Q1)

Tipo y forma: Article (Published version)

Área (Departamento): Área Ingen.e Infraestr.Transp. (Dpto. Ingeniería Mecánica)
Área (Departamento): Área Fisioterapia (Dpto. Fisiatría y Enfermería)