Is device guided training targeted to the craniocervical flexor and extensor muscles efficacious? A preliminary randomized controlled trial in a cervicogenic headache population
Resumen: Background: Specific neck exercise is effective in the management of cervicogenic headache (CH). The Spinertial device was designed to facilitate craniocervical flexion and extension training, but its efficacy, judged on change in headache impact, has not been tested.
Objective: To compare guided and progressive resisted specific neck exercise targeted to the craniocervical flexors and extensors (SNE-fe) performed with Spinertial device to progressive SNE-fe without the device in a cohort with CH.
Design: Randomised controlled trial.
Methods: Twenty-eight participants with CH were randomly allocated to the Spinertial group (SG) or SNE-fe exercise group without the device (EG). Both groups performed 12 sessions of SNE-fe over six-weeks. The primary outcome was headache impact (HIT-6). Secondary outcomes were the craniocervical flexion test (CCFT), upper cervical (UCS) and lower cervical range of movement, flexion rotation test (FRT) analysed as more or less restricted side (MRS, LRS), the self-reported global rating of change (GROC-scale) and satisfaction with the exercise program (PACES). Outcomes were measured at baseline, post-intervention (T1) and after 1-month (T2).
Results: Significant between-groups differences were found favouring the SG for HIT-6 (T1 p =0.010, d =0.5; T2 p <0.004, d =0.4), CCFT, UCS ROM, FRT MRS, FRT LRS, PACES and GROC-scale (T1: all p <0.01; T2: all p < 0.01). Effects sizes were large (>0.8) at T1 and T2. No between-groups differences were found for lower cervical ROM.
Conclusion: Training with the Spinertial was more effective than SNE without the device for improving the impact of headache, the endurance of deep neck flexors and UCS ROM in participants with CH.

Idioma: Inglés
DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2023.102900
Año: 2023
Publicado en: MUSCULOSKELETAL SCIENCE AND PRACTICE 69, 102900 (2023), [8 pp.]
ISSN: 2468-8630

Factor impacto JCR: 2.2 (2023)
Categ. JCR: REHABILITATION rank: 29 / 169 = 0.172 (2023) - Q1 - T1
Factor impacto CITESCORE: 4.1 - Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (Q2)

Factor impacto SCIMAGO: 0.755 - Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (Q1)

Tipo y forma: Article (PostPrint)
Área (Departamento): Área Fisioterapia (Dpto. Fisiatría y Enfermería)

Rights Reserved All rights reserved by journal editor


Exportado de SIDERAL (2024-07-31-09:39:00)


Visitas y descargas

Este artículo se encuentra en las siguientes colecciones:
Articles



 Record created 2024-01-26, last modified 2024-07-31


Postprint:
 PDF
Rate this document:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Not yet reviewed)