Chromosome-specific induction of micronuclei and chromosomal aberrations by mitomycin C: Involvement of human chromosomes 9, 1 and 16
Resumen: Cytogenetic studies have shown that human chromosomes 1, 9, and 16, with a large heterochromatic region of highly methylated classical satellite DNA, are prone to induction of chromatid breaks and interchanges by mitomycin C (MMC). A couple of studies have indicated that material from chromosome 9, and possibly also from chromosomes 1 and 16, are preferentially micronucleated by MMC. Here, we further examined the chromosome-specific induction of micronuclei (MN; with and without cytochalasin B) and chromosomal aberrations (CAs) by MMC. Cultures of isolated human lymphocytes from two male donors were treated (at 48 h of culture, for 24 h) with MMC (500 ng/ml), and the induced MN were examined by a pancentromeric DNA probe and paint probe for chromosome 9, and by paint probes for chromosomes 1 and 16. MMC increased the total frequency of MN by 6–8-fold but the frequency of chromosome 9 -positive (9+) MN by 29–30-fold and the frequency of chromosome 1 -positive (1+) MN and chromosome 16 -positive (16+) MN by 12–16-fold and 10–17-fold, respectively. After treatment with MMC, 34–47 % of all MN were 9+, 17–20 % 1+, and 3–4 % 16+. The majority (94–96 %) of the 9+ MN contained no centromere and thus harboured acentric fragments. When MMC-induced CAs aberrations were characterized by using the pancentromeric DNA probe and probes for the classical satellite region and long- and short- arm telomeres of chromosome 9, a high proportion of chromosomal breaks (31 %) and interchanges (41 %) concerned chromosome 9. In 83 % of cases, the breakpoint in chromosome 9 was just below the region (9cen-q12) labelled by the classical satellite probe. Our results indicate that MMC specifically induces MN harbouring fragments of chromosome 9, 1, and 16. CAs of chromosome 9 are highly overrepresented in metaphases of MMC-treated lymphocytes. The preferential breakpoint is below the region 9q12.
Idioma: Inglés
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2024.503753
Año: 2024
Publicado en: MUTATION RESEARCH-GENETIC TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MUTAGENESIS 896 (2024), 503753 [9 pp.]
ISSN: 1383-5718

Factor impacto JCR: 2.5 (2024)
Categ. JCR: GENETICS & HEREDITY rank: 95 / 192 = 0.495 (2024) - Q2 - T2
Categ. JCR: TOXICOLOGY rank: 66 / 106 = 0.623 (2024) - Q3 - T2
Categ. JCR: BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY rank: 104 / 177 = 0.588 (2024) - Q3 - T2

Factor impacto CITESCORE: 4.4 - Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (Q3) - Genetics (Q3)

Factor impacto SCIMAGO: 0.668 - Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (Q2) - Genetics (Q3)

Tipo y forma: Artículo (Versión definitiva)
Área (Departamento): Área Genética (Dpto. Anatom.,Embri.Genét.Ani.)

Creative Commons Debe reconocer adecuadamente la autoría, proporcionar un enlace a la licencia e indicar si se han realizado cambios. Puede hacerlo de cualquier manera razonable, pero no de una manera que sugiera que tiene el apoyo del licenciador o lo recibe por el uso que hace.


Exportado de SIDERAL (2026-02-17-20:21:49)


Visitas y descargas

Este artículo se encuentra en las siguientes colecciones:
Artículos > Artículos por área > Genética



 Registro creado el 2024-04-16, última modificación el 2026-02-17


Versión publicada:
 PDF
Valore este documento:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Sin ninguna reseña)