Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging with electrodiagnosis in the evaluation of clinical suspicion of lumbosacral radiculopathy

Montaner-Cuello, Alberto (Universidad de Zaragoza) ; Caudevilla-Polo, Santos (Universidad de Zaragoza) ; Rodríguez-Mena, Diego (Universidad de Zaragoza) ; Ciuffreda, Gianluca (Universidad de Zaragoza) ; Pardos-Aguilella, Pilar (Universidad de Zaragoza) ; Albarova-Corral, Isabel (Universidad de Zaragoza) ; Pérez-Rey, Jorge (Universidad de Zaragoza) ; Bueno-Gracia, Elena (Universidad de Zaragoza)

Resumen: (1) Background: The diagnosis of lumbosacral radiculopathy involves anamnesis, an assessment of sensitivity and strength, diagnostic imaging—usually magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)—and electrodiagnostic testing (EDX), typically electromyography (EMG), and electroneurography (ENG). MRI evaluates the structures supporting the spinal cord, while EDX evaluates root functionality. The present study aimed to analyze the concordance of MRI and EDX findings in patients with clinically suspected radiculopathy. Additionally, we investigated the comparison between these two reference tests and various clinical variables and questionnaires. (2) Methods: We designed a prospective epidemiological study of consecutive cases with an observational, descriptive, cross-sectional, and double-blind nature following the STROBE guidelines, encompassing 142 patients with clinical suspicion of lumbosacral radiculopathy. (3) Results: Of the sample, 58.5% tested positive for radiculopathy using EDX as the reference test, while 45.8% tested positive using MRI. The comparison between MRI and EDX in the diagnosis of radiculopathy in patients with clinical suspicion was not significant; the overall agreement was 40.8%. Only the years with symptoms were comparatively significant between the positive and negative radiculopathy groups as determined by EDX. (4) Conclusion: The comparison between lumbar radiculopathy diagnoses in patients with clinically suspected pathology using MRI and EDX as diagnostic modalities did not yield statistically significant findings. MRI and EDX are complementary tests assessing different aspects in patients with suspected radiculopathy; degeneration of the structures supporting the spinal cord does not necessarily imply root dysfunction.

Idioma: Inglés

DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14121258

Año: 2024

Publicado en: Diagnostics 14, 12 (2024), 1258 [10 p.]
ISSN: 2075-4418

Factor impacto JCR: 3.3 (2024)

Categ. JCR: MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL rank: 57 / 332 = 0.172 (2024) - Q1 - T1

Factor impacto SCIMAGO: 0.773 - Internal Medicine (Q2) - Clinical Biochemistry (Q2)

Tipo y forma: Article (Published version)

Área (Departamento): Area Medicina (Dpto. Medicina, Psiqu. y Derm.)
Área (Departamento): Area Anatom.Embriol.Humana (Dpto. Anatom.Histolog.Humanas)
Área (Departamento): Área Fisioterapia (Dpto. Fisiatría y Enfermería)