Higher incidence of adverse events in isolated patients compared with non-isolated patients: A cohort study
Jiménez-Pericás, F. ; Gea Velázquez De Castro, M.T. ; Pastor-Valero, M. ; Aibar Remón, C. (Universidad de Zaragoza) ; Miralles, J.J. ; Meyer García, M.D.C. ; Aranaz Andrés, J.M.
Resumen: Objective
To determine whether isolated patients admitted to hospital have a higher incidence of adverse events (AEs), to identify their nature, impact and preventability.
Design
Prospective cohort study with isolated and non-isolated patients.
Setting
One public university hospital in the Valencian Community (southeast Spain).
Participants
We consecutively collected 400 patients, 200 isolated and 200 non-isolated, age =18 years old, to match according to date of entry, admission department, sex, age (±5 years) and disease severity from April 2017 to October 2018. Exclusion criteria: patients age <18 years old and/or reverse isolation patients.
Primary and secondary outcome measures
The primary outcome as the AE, defined according to the National Study of Adverse Effects linked to Hospitalisation (Estudio Nacional Sobre los Efectos Adversos) criteria. Cumulative incidence rates and AE incidence density rates were calculated.
Results
The incidence of isolated patients with AEs 16.5% (95% CI 11.4% to 21.6%) compared with 9.5% (95% CI 5.4% to 13.6%) in non-isolated (p<0.03). The incidence density of patients with AEs among isolated patients was 11.8 per 1000?days/patient (95%?CI 7.8 to 15.9) compared with 4.3 per 1000?days/patient (95%?CI 2.4 to 6.3) among non-isolated patients (p<0.001). The incidence of AEs among isolated patients was 18.5% compared with 11% for non-isolated patients (p<0.09). Among the 37 AEs detected in 33 isolated patients, and the 22 AEs detected in 19 non-isolated patients, most corresponded to healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) for both isolated and non-isolated patients (48.6% vs 45.4%). There were significant differences with respect to the preventability of AEs, (67.6% among isolated patients compared with 52.6% among non-isolated patients).
Conclusions
AEs were significantly higher in isolated patients compared with non-isolated patients, more than half being preventable and with HAIs as the primary cause. It is essential to improve training and the safety culture of healthcare professionals relating to the care provided to this type of patient.
Idioma: Inglés
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035238
Año: 2020
Publicado en: BMJ open 10, 10 (2020), e035238 [9 pp]
ISSN: 2044-6055
Factor impacto JCR: 2.692 (2020)
Categ. JCR: MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL rank: 64 / 169 = 0.379 (2020) - Q2 - T2
Factor impacto SCIMAGO: 1.131 - Medicine (miscellaneous) (Q1)
Financiación: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MINECO-ISCIII/PI13-01921
Tipo y forma: Article (Published version)
Área (Departamento): Área Medic.Prevent.Salud Públ. (Dpto. Microb.Ped.Radio.Sal.Pú.)
You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
Exportado de SIDERAL (2021-09-02-10:40:01)
Visitas y descargas
To determine whether isolated patients admitted to hospital have a higher incidence of adverse events (AEs), to identify their nature, impact and preventability.
Design
Prospective cohort study with isolated and non-isolated patients.
Setting
One public university hospital in the Valencian Community (southeast Spain).
Participants
We consecutively collected 400 patients, 200 isolated and 200 non-isolated, age =18 years old, to match according to date of entry, admission department, sex, age (±5 years) and disease severity from April 2017 to October 2018. Exclusion criteria: patients age <18 years old and/or reverse isolation patients.
Primary and secondary outcome measures
The primary outcome as the AE, defined according to the National Study of Adverse Effects linked to Hospitalisation (Estudio Nacional Sobre los Efectos Adversos) criteria. Cumulative incidence rates and AE incidence density rates were calculated.
Results
The incidence of isolated patients with AEs 16.5% (95% CI 11.4% to 21.6%) compared with 9.5% (95% CI 5.4% to 13.6%) in non-isolated (p<0.03). The incidence density of patients with AEs among isolated patients was 11.8 per 1000?days/patient (95%?CI 7.8 to 15.9) compared with 4.3 per 1000?days/patient (95%?CI 2.4 to 6.3) among non-isolated patients (p<0.001). The incidence of AEs among isolated patients was 18.5% compared with 11% for non-isolated patients (p<0.09). Among the 37 AEs detected in 33 isolated patients, and the 22 AEs detected in 19 non-isolated patients, most corresponded to healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) for both isolated and non-isolated patients (48.6% vs 45.4%). There were significant differences with respect to the preventability of AEs, (67.6% among isolated patients compared with 52.6% among non-isolated patients).
Conclusions
AEs were significantly higher in isolated patients compared with non-isolated patients, more than half being preventable and with HAIs as the primary cause. It is essential to improve training and the safety culture of healthcare professionals relating to the care provided to this type of patient.
Idioma: Inglés
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035238
Año: 2020
Publicado en: BMJ open 10, 10 (2020), e035238 [9 pp]
ISSN: 2044-6055
Factor impacto JCR: 2.692 (2020)
Categ. JCR: MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL rank: 64 / 169 = 0.379 (2020) - Q2 - T2
Factor impacto SCIMAGO: 1.131 - Medicine (miscellaneous) (Q1)
Financiación: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MINECO-ISCIII/PI13-01921
Tipo y forma: Article (Published version)
Área (Departamento): Área Medic.Prevent.Salud Públ. (Dpto. Microb.Ped.Radio.Sal.Pú.)
You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. You may not use the material for commercial purposes. Exportado de SIDERAL (2021-09-02-10:40:01)
Permalink:
Visitas y descargas
Este artículo se encuentra en las siguientes colecciones:
Articles > Artículos por área > Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública
Record created 2020-12-17, last modified 2021-09-02