Employee-robot collaboration in services: psychological ownership, customer attributions and engagement
Resumen: This research examines, through two studies, the relationship between psychological ownership triggers in service robots (perceived manipulability, receptiveness, and attractiveness) and customer engagement arising during service encounters where employee-robot collaboration occurs. Employing partial least squares, fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis, and text analysis in two studies, this study demonstrates that manipulability, receptiveness, and attractiveness are positively related to customer engagement with the service robot, mediated by customer attributions of service enhancement. Customer attributions of cost reductions do not exert any influence during this process, either directly or indirectly. Results indicate that companies can activate psychological ownership feelings by properly combining robot design, service-level cues, and customer segments to ensure that customers find service robots manipulable, receptive, and attractive when they collaborate with humans.
Idioma: Inglés
DOI: 10.1080/02642069.2025.2508975
Año: 2025
Publicado en: SERVICE INDUSTRIES JOURNAL (2025), 1-28
ISSN: 0264-2069

Tipo y forma: Article (PostPrint)
Área (Departamento): Área Comerci.Investig.Mercados (Dpto. Direc.Mark.Inves.Mercad.)

Creative Commons You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. You may not use the material for commercial purposes. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.


Fecha de embargo : 2026-12-13
Exportado de SIDERAL (2025-10-17-14:19:28)


Visitas y descargas

Este artículo se encuentra en las siguientes colecciones:
Articles > Artículos por área > Comercialización e Investigación de Mercados



 Record created 2025-06-25, last modified 2025-10-17


Postprint:
 PDF
Rate this document:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Not yet reviewed)