Efficacy of cognitive intervention programs in amnesic mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review
Gómez-Soria, I. (Universidad de Zaragoza) ; Peralta-Marrupe, P. (Universidad de Zaragoza) ; Calatayud-Sanz, E. (Universidad de Zaragoza) ; Latorre, E. (Universidad de Zaragoza)
Resumen: Background:: Amnesic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) is considered a prodromal stage of Alzheimer''s disease. Given the absence of an effective pharmacological treatment for aMCI, increasing numbers of studies are attempting to understand how cognitive interventions could benefit aMCI patients. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the current evidence regarding the efficacy on cognition of cognitive intervention programs in older adults with aMCI.
Methods:: We searched for randomized controlled trials and clinical trials published until March 2020 on PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, SCOPUS, and OTseeker. A total of 454 works were identified and 7 studies that met the inclusion criteria, were included in this review. PRISMA guidelines were followed and PEDro scale was included for the measurement of the quality of the selected studies.
Results:: Cognitive interventions showed positive effects on cognition. Cognitive training programs considerably enhanced the Mini Mental State Examination scores. However, no relevant differences in global cognition were found using other assessment tools as DRS-2 or ADAS-Cog Scale. Cognitive training and cognitive rehabilitation programs seemed to improve several cognitive domains as memory, language or executive function in aMCI patients in both post-training and at follow-up analysis.
Conclusions:: Our findings support that cognitive interventions can be an effective option for people with aMCI. Cognitive interventions improved global cognitive function post-intervention, but also seemed to enhance some cognitive domains post-intervention and at follow-up. However, more studies are needed to analyze the potential benefits of cognitive intervention on aMCI.
Idioma: Inglés
DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2020.104332
Año: 2021
Publicado en: ARCHIVES OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS 94 (2021), 104332 [10 pp.]
ISSN: 0167-4943
Factor impacto JCR: 4.163 (2021)
Categ. JCR: GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY rank: 27 / 54 = 0.5 (2021) - Q2 - T2
Factor impacto CITESCORE: 5.3 - Social Sciences (Q1) - Nursing (Q1) - Medicine (Q1) - Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (Q2)
Factor impacto SCIMAGO: 0.953 - Geriatrics and Gerontology (Q1) - Health (social science) (Q1) - Gerontology (Q1)
Tipo y forma: Review (PostPrint)
Área (Departamento): Área Fisioterapia (Dpto. Fisiatría y Enfermería)
Área (Departamento): Área Biología Celular (Dpto. Bioq.Biolog.Mol. Celular)
You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. You may not use the material for commercial purposes. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
Exportado de SIDERAL (2025-10-17-14:14:59)
Visitas y descargas
Methods:: We searched for randomized controlled trials and clinical trials published until March 2020 on PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, SCOPUS, and OTseeker. A total of 454 works were identified and 7 studies that met the inclusion criteria, were included in this review. PRISMA guidelines were followed and PEDro scale was included for the measurement of the quality of the selected studies.
Results:: Cognitive interventions showed positive effects on cognition. Cognitive training programs considerably enhanced the Mini Mental State Examination scores. However, no relevant differences in global cognition were found using other assessment tools as DRS-2 or ADAS-Cog Scale. Cognitive training and cognitive rehabilitation programs seemed to improve several cognitive domains as memory, language or executive function in aMCI patients in both post-training and at follow-up analysis.
Conclusions:: Our findings support that cognitive interventions can be an effective option for people with aMCI. Cognitive interventions improved global cognitive function post-intervention, but also seemed to enhance some cognitive domains post-intervention and at follow-up. However, more studies are needed to analyze the potential benefits of cognitive intervention on aMCI.
Idioma: Inglés
DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2020.104332
Año: 2021
Publicado en: ARCHIVES OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS 94 (2021), 104332 [10 pp.]
ISSN: 0167-4943
Factor impacto JCR: 4.163 (2021)
Categ. JCR: GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY rank: 27 / 54 = 0.5 (2021) - Q2 - T2
Factor impacto CITESCORE: 5.3 - Social Sciences (Q1) - Nursing (Q1) - Medicine (Q1) - Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (Q2)
Factor impacto SCIMAGO: 0.953 - Geriatrics and Gerontology (Q1) - Health (social science) (Q1) - Gerontology (Q1)
Tipo y forma: Review (PostPrint)
Área (Departamento): Área Fisioterapia (Dpto. Fisiatría y Enfermería)
Área (Departamento): Área Biología Celular (Dpto. Bioq.Biolog.Mol. Celular)
You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. You may not use the material for commercial purposes. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material. Exportado de SIDERAL (2025-10-17-14:14:59)
Permalink:
Visitas y descargas
Este artículo se encuentra en las siguientes colecciones:
Articles > Artículos por área > biologia_celular
Articles > Artículos por área > Fisioterapia
Record created 2025-08-29, last modified 2025-10-17