Use of 2-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography to assess left ventricular systolic function in dogs with systemic inflammatory response syndrome
Corda, A. ; Pinna Parpaglia, M.L. ; Sotgiu, G. ; Zobba, R. ; Gomez Ochoa, P. (Universidad de Zaragoza) ; Prieto Ramos, J. ; French, A.
Resumen: Background: Early identification of systolic dysfunction in dogs with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) potentially could improve the outcome and decrease mortality.
Objective: To compare 2-dimensional speckle tracking (2D-STE) with 2-dimensional (2D) and M-mode echocardiography in the evaluation of systolic function in SIRS dogs.
Animals: Seventeen SIRS and 17 healthy dogs.
Methods: Prospective observational case-control study. Each dog underwent physical examination, conventional echocardiography, 2D-STE, and C-reactive protein measurement.
Results: Dogs with SIRS had lower 2D-STE ejection fraction (X4D-EF; 44 ± 8 versus 53 ± 8; P =.003), endocardial global longitudinal strain (ENDO-G-Long-St; -14.6 ± 3.2 versus -18.5 ± 4.1; P =.003), and normalized left ventricular diameter in diastole (1.38 ± 0.25 versus 1.54 ± 0.17; P =.04) and systole (0.85 ± 0.18 versus 0.97 ± 0.11; P =.03) as compared to healthy dogs. Simpson method of disks (SMOD) right parasternal EF (55 ± 9 versus 60 ± 6; P =.07) and end systolic volume index (ESVI; 23 ± 10 versus 21 ± 6; P =.61), SMOD left apical EF (59 ± 9 versus 59 ± 6; P =.87) and ESVI (20 ± 8 versus 22 ± 6; P =.25), fractional shortening (FS; 34 ± 5 versus 33 ± 4; P =.39), M-mode EF (64 ± 7 versus 62 ± 5; P =.35), and ESVI (23 ± 11 versus 30 ± 9; P =.06) were not significantly different between SIRS and control group, respectively.
Conclusion and Clinical Importance: Speckle tracking X4D-EF and ENDO-G-Long-St are more sensitive than 2D and M-Mode FS, EF, and ESVI in detecting systolic impairment in dogs with SIRS.
Idioma: Inglés
DOI: 10.1111/jvim.15438
Año: 2019
Publicado en: Journal of veterinary internal medicine 33, 2 (2019), 423-431
ISSN: 0891-6640
Factor impacto JCR: 2.194 (2019)
Categ. JCR: VETERINARY SCIENCES rank: 20 / 142 = 0.141 (2019) - Q1 - T1
Factor impacto SCIMAGO: 1.211 - Veterinary (miscellaneous) (Q1) - Medicine (miscellaneous) (Q1)
Tipo y forma: Artículo (Versión definitiva)
Área (Departamento): Área Medicina y Cirugía Animal (Dpto. Patología Animal)
Debe reconocer adecuadamente la autoría, proporcionar un enlace a la licencia e indicar si se han realizado cambios. Puede hacerlo de cualquier manera razonable, pero no de una manera que sugiera que tiene el apoyo del licenciador o lo recibe por el uso que hace. No puede utilizar el material para una finalidad comercial. Si remezcla, transforma o crea a partir del material, no puede difundir el material modificado.
Exportado de SIDERAL (2020-07-16-09:30:19)
Visitas y descargas
Objective: To compare 2-dimensional speckle tracking (2D-STE) with 2-dimensional (2D) and M-mode echocardiography in the evaluation of systolic function in SIRS dogs.
Animals: Seventeen SIRS and 17 healthy dogs.
Methods: Prospective observational case-control study. Each dog underwent physical examination, conventional echocardiography, 2D-STE, and C-reactive protein measurement.
Results: Dogs with SIRS had lower 2D-STE ejection fraction (X4D-EF; 44 ± 8 versus 53 ± 8; P =.003), endocardial global longitudinal strain (ENDO-G-Long-St; -14.6 ± 3.2 versus -18.5 ± 4.1; P =.003), and normalized left ventricular diameter in diastole (1.38 ± 0.25 versus 1.54 ± 0.17; P =.04) and systole (0.85 ± 0.18 versus 0.97 ± 0.11; P =.03) as compared to healthy dogs. Simpson method of disks (SMOD) right parasternal EF (55 ± 9 versus 60 ± 6; P =.07) and end systolic volume index (ESVI; 23 ± 10 versus 21 ± 6; P =.61), SMOD left apical EF (59 ± 9 versus 59 ± 6; P =.87) and ESVI (20 ± 8 versus 22 ± 6; P =.25), fractional shortening (FS; 34 ± 5 versus 33 ± 4; P =.39), M-mode EF (64 ± 7 versus 62 ± 5; P =.35), and ESVI (23 ± 11 versus 30 ± 9; P =.06) were not significantly different between SIRS and control group, respectively.
Conclusion and Clinical Importance: Speckle tracking X4D-EF and ENDO-G-Long-St are more sensitive than 2D and M-Mode FS, EF, and ESVI in detecting systolic impairment in dogs with SIRS.
Idioma: Inglés
DOI: 10.1111/jvim.15438
Año: 2019
Publicado en: Journal of veterinary internal medicine 33, 2 (2019), 423-431
ISSN: 0891-6640
Factor impacto JCR: 2.194 (2019)
Categ. JCR: VETERINARY SCIENCES rank: 20 / 142 = 0.141 (2019) - Q1 - T1
Factor impacto SCIMAGO: 1.211 - Veterinary (miscellaneous) (Q1) - Medicine (miscellaneous) (Q1)
Tipo y forma: Artículo (Versión definitiva)
Área (Departamento): Área Medicina y Cirugía Animal (Dpto. Patología Animal)
Debe reconocer adecuadamente la autoría, proporcionar un enlace a la licencia e indicar si se han realizado cambios. Puede hacerlo de cualquier manera razonable, pero no de una manera que sugiera que tiene el apoyo del licenciador o lo recibe por el uso que hace. No puede utilizar el material para una finalidad comercial. Si remezcla, transforma o crea a partir del material, no puede difundir el material modificado.Exportado de SIDERAL (2020-07-16-09:30:19)
Enlace permanente:
Visitas y descargas
Este artículo se encuentra en las siguientes colecciones:
Artículos > Artículos por área > Medicina y Cirugía Animal
Registro creado el 2019-03-13, última modificación el 2020-07-16