Critical ethnographies of education and for social and educational transformation: A meta-ethnography
Resumen: In a 2016 special issue on the relationships between ethnography of education and social, economic, and material precarity, Geoff Bright and John Smyth were critical of ethnographic researchers, for concentrating on discourses and discourse production only, rather than on material conditions to develop activism and processes of transformation against oppression. Instead of only identifying and critiquing precarity, and deconstructing taken-for-granted ideas to give voice to ingrained forms of oppression and marginalization, critical ethnography they wrote, should really be about changing, not only describing and analyzing, oppressive conditions. In the present article, we attempt to identify and explore cases where researchers have overcome the reluctance toward activism and transformation. Using empirical examples we will try to illustrate what characterized these efforts and what seemed to support their success.
Idioma: Inglés
DOI: 10.1177/1077800420935916
Año: 2020
Publicado en: QUALITATIVE INQUIRY 27, 6 (2020), 677-688
ISSN: 1077-8004

Factor impacto JCR: 4.716 (2020)
Categ. JCR: SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY rank: 7 / 110 = 0.064 (2020) - Q1 - T1
Factor impacto SCIMAGO: 0.906 - Social Sciences (miscellaneous) (Q1) - Anthropology (Q1)

Tipo y forma: Article (Published version)
Área (Departamento): Área Didáctica y Organiz. Esc. (Dpto. Ciencias de la Educación)

Creative Commons You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.


Exportado de SIDERAL (2022-04-26-08:52:27)


Visitas y descargas

Este artículo se encuentra en las siguientes colecciones:
Articles



 Record created 2020-07-27, last modified 2022-04-26


Versión publicada:
 PDF
Rate this document:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Not yet reviewed)